SUTRAS
SUTRAS
The Japanese word kankin has two
parts. Kan means to read, and kin means sutras.
Sutras are records
of the supposed talks of Shakyamuni Buddha who lived some 2500 years ago. Some
Buddhist schools have adopted particular sutras, theorizing Buddhism can better
be understood through written words. Other schools say Buddhism is not a theoretical
system, and that truth does not reside in words.
The
Buddha himself took what is known as the middle way. It was a path of
moderation, of self-control, of understanding that opened knowledge, and led to
insight and awakening.
Master Dogen also favored
the middle way. He said reading sutras was possibly one method of learning what
Buddhism is. However, he added that wisdom was not in sutras, and that sutras
did not have some supernatural element that led to awakening.
Dogen
looked beyond sutras as collections of words and pithy sayings. Just as he
believed meditation was awakening, he
believed all of existence was a sutra. Grass, trees, mountains, rivers, and self
were all Buddhist sutras, and they did not have to be numbered, named, and
recited.
Dogen
cautioned that what we call self is not restricted by “me and you.” Self is not
ego. Self is eyes and ears and all of the five physical senses.
Sutras are something
to be read, to be recited, to be copied, to be received, and to be retained
instinctively. But Dogen said sutras—like awakening—are to be experienced
intuitively.
Instinct is a natural,
built-in behavior, such as sharks attacking anything that seems to be food.
Intuition is a gut feeling, an inner understanding that does not depend on logical
thinking.
Dogen tells the
story of Zen Master Kodo who one day was told that his monks were anticipating
his instruction.
“Strike the bell,”
Kodo said.
The monks gathered.
Kodo sat in front
of the monks for a few minutes, saying nothing. Then he got up and went back to
his quarters.
The temple chief
was puzzled. He asked the master why he hadn’t said a word.
Kodo answered,
“There are sutra teachers, and there are commentary teachers. I can speak at
great length on such subjects. However, I teach neither. Instead, I encourage
intuition, and there is little to speak of on that matter.”
Another
story tells of a master who was conversing with a king. The king said,
“Everyone else recites sutras. Why is it that you do not?”
The
master said memorizing sutras and bringing sutras here and there was a state of
bustling and jostling. The true state of mind was not measured by a perfect
memory or faultless understanding. It was beyond wisdom, in the living of the
moment.
One
more story tells of a government official who requested that a master read and
recite all of the sutras. The master and the official bowed to each other.
Then
they bowed again.
Then they bowed some
more.
Finally the master
said, “Do you understand?”
The
official said, “I do not understand.”
The
master said, “You have two eyes, two ears, and one tongue. We have read and
recited and experienced all of the sutras. How could you not understand?”
And
now I have a question for you, and you don’t have to shake your head or nod
your head.
Do
you understand?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home