MOHISM
This evening I would like to say a few things about Mo.
That isn’t the middleman of Manny, Moe, and
Jack, the Pep Boys of automotive fame. I’m talking about the Chinese
philosopher, Mo Tsu, or Master Mo, or Mozi. His
insights were brilliant, but for various reasons they didn’t last long after
his death around 390 BC. However, Mohism eventually combined with the thoughts
of Chuang Tsu and Lao Tsu and emerged as Taoist principles.
That is to say,
Chuang Tsu and Lao Tsu may be thought of as so-called founders of Taoism, but
many of Taoism’s concepts grew out of Mohism.
Nothing is truly
new or original.
About the name:
My researches mention that the actual ancestral name and clan name of Mozi is
unknown, perhaps because the man was born into the lower classes of Chinese
society. In the days of Chinese antiquity the vast majority of people who
weren’t related to aristocratic families didn’t possess ancestral and clan
names.
Another tidbit
out of the past says that one source of Mozi’s name may have had to do the
philosopher’s complexion, which was dark. It’s a good story, and I quote: “Mozi was going
north and met a fortune teller on the way. The fortune teller told him: ‘God
kills the black dragon in the north today. Your complexion is dark. So you must
not go north.’”
So Moe did not go north.
Rather than
stir this murky name pot, we will use the name Mozi, or Mo.
There is some
evidence that Mozi was a carpenter. Apparently he was accomplished in designing
mechanical birds and other amusing contrivances. Who knows, he might have been
the forerunner of the Swiss cuckoo clock. Mo also created what were called
cloud ladders used to besiege city walls. Though he was a self-effacing
individual, various rulers considered him an expert on defensive military
construction.
Like others of
his time, Mozi was initially educated in Confucianism principles. But he
considered Confucian beliefs as too fatalistic, and he disagreed on its ritual
celebrations and funerals. He thought such ceremonies were beyond the means of
common people.
Craftspeople
were attracted to Mozi probably because of his practical skills, and they
tended to organize themselves as a school devoted to the man’s philosophical
and technical writings. Everything needs a name, even way back then, so Mozi’s
followers became known s Mohists.
One disciple of
Confucius, named Mencius, wrote that Mozi believed in love not just within the
family but for all of humanity. To quote Mencius, “As long as something
benefits mankind, Mozi will pursue it even if it means hurting his head or his
feet.”
Mozi’s notion
of universal love may have been resurrected for the counterculture movement of
the 1960s and 1970 that shucked marriage as a form of social bondage. Remember San
Francisco’s Flower Children? However, I doubt that contemporary
view of free love was what the old Chinese fellow had in mind.
He did
encourage early marriage in order to offset the individuals lost in wars.
Nepotism was
popular In ancient China, and the
handing out of political appointments to one’s relatives rankled Mozi. He
insisted such posts should be given to worthy individuals who were best
equipped to handle them. As long as a person was qualified for a task, that
position should be his regardless of blood relations. If someone of high rank was
not up to the job, even if he was a close relative of the ruler, he should be canned.
Mozi respected talented people and urged
they should be in government instead of mere political appointees. To use a
metaphor, he said a good bow is difficult to pull, but it shoots high. A
good horse is difficult to ride, but it can carry weight and can travel far.
Talented people may difficult to manage, but they can bring respect to their
rulers.
Accordingly, a ruler should treasure skilled
people and seek their counsel.
That sounds like good advice for modern individuals
that are in power.
Mozi’s moral
teachings emphasized self-reflection and authenticity rather than blind
obedience to ritual. According to him, when one reflects on one’s own successes
and failures, one achieves true self-nature. This involves living a simple life
in which material and spiritual extravagance were renounced.
Mozi believed people were capable of
changing their circumstances and directing their own lives. They could do this
by applying their senses to observing the world, and by seeing the worth of
objects and events through their causes, their functions, and their historical
bases.
Picture the multi-million dollar homes
individuals build today. The places with six or eight bedrooms and as many
bathrooms.
“What is the purpose of houses?” Mo wrote.”
It is to protect us from the wind and cold of winter, the heat and rain of
summer, and to keep out robbers and thieves. Once these ends have been secured,
that is all. Whatever does not contribute to these ends should be eliminated.”
Great shades of
Buddhist thought.
Mozi compared
the carpenter who uses standard tools with the head of state, who might not
have any standards or qualifications to do his job. In the long run the skilled
worker is better off when depending on his standard tools rather than on his
emotions.
In the book One Hundred Philosophers: A Guide to the world’s Greatest Thinkers, by
Peter J. King, the author wrote “Mohism promotes a philosophy of impartial
caring. A person should care equally for other individuals, regardless of their
actual relationship to him or her. “
Isn’t this close to what, in Buddhism,
is called compassion?
As I mentioned earlier, Mohism’s
popularity faded, but his ideas were revived again two thousand years after his
death. Both the Chinese Republican revolutionaries of 1911, now based in Taiwan, and the Chinese Communist Party
considered Mozi a surprisingly modernist thinker.
For those who want to pursue
the story of Mozi, there is a book available through Amazon titled The Mozi: A Complete Translation, by Ian
Johnston. It costs around $80.00.
In
conclusion, here are the philosophical words of another Moe, the Moe of the
three stooges: “What will the world do without me? What will I do without me?”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home