SAMURAI MIND
II
This talk constitutes the second
part of my previous talk on the contradictions between Zen as a peaceful,
harmonious way of life and the killing philosophy of samurai swordsmen. Most of
the events occurred in feudal Japan,
during a period that lasted from the late 1100s to the mid-1800s.
A
Tendai Buddhist priest named Myoan Eisai lived from 1141 to 1215. When he was
27 years old he went to the Rinzai School
at Mount Tianta
in China where
he was introduced to Chan (Zen, in Japanese). The new knowledge made such an
impact on him that in 1187 he returned to China
and became a disciple of Rinzai master Xuan Huaichang.
Back
in Japan Eisai built the country’s first Zen temple in Kamakura
and founded Kennin-ji in Kyoto. His
most notable disciple was Eihei Dogan, the founder of Japan’s
Soto school.
As
an aside, Eisai is remembered also for his introduction of tea drinking. He
believed that the powdered green tea called matcha
was not only tasty and healthy but helped to keep a meditator wide awake. In Japan
matcha was first used at Zen monasteries, and eventually it was adopted by the upper
class aristocrats.
That leads to an
ancient Zen saying:
Drink tea and
nourish life.
With the first sip... joy.
With the second... satisfaction.
With the third, peace.
With the fourth, a toasted bagel.
With the first sip... joy.
With the second... satisfaction.
With the third, peace.
With the fourth, a toasted bagel.
By
1300 Zen had become accepted by Japan’s
rulers. Owing to its emphasis on meditation and discipline, it also became a
magnet for hired swordsmen known as samurai.
A
personal note. The last time I was in Japan,
some thirteen years ago, I observed a ritualistic Shinto wedding. It made me
wonder about the interwoven practices of Buddhism, Shinto, and Christianity in
the country. When I asked a friend about this apparent inconsistency I was told
that a Japanese is born Buddhist, marries Shinto, and is buried Christian.
That
seems a tidy way of addressing the intellectual differences.
Quoting
Zen scholar Heinrich Dumoulin, “. . . it became a proverb in the Kamakura
era that ‘Tendai is for the imperial court, Shingon for the nobility, Zen for
the warrior class . . .”
Japan
may have been influenced by Zen, but it’s no secret that the country’s rulers
fought one another over a wide range of issues. This meant that in turn,
samurai fought against samurai as much as Union soldiers fought against
Confederate soldiers in America’s
Civil War.
Interestingly,
after the struggles within their nation settled down, many samurai retired to
monasteries to make up for their killing of fellow men.
In
the book Zen and the Way of the Sword the
author (Winston L. King) points out that the Japanese sense of family loyalty
and tradition was looked on as a sacred inheritance. This added to karmic predestination,
or fate, that an individual—even a Buddhist samurai—is meant to understand his
destiny, even if it means destroying life.
Around
1336 the prime rulers of Japan
were the Ashikaga shogunate (also called the Muromachi Rule).
Shogunate
is a Japanese word that referred to a military rank of the highest degree, such
as the modern term generalissimo. Shoguns were answerable only to the Emperor. As
King mentions, the shogun warrior class called the tune.
That
word bushi, or bushido, is literally the way of the warrior. It originated from
the samurai moral code that stressed frugality, loyalty, and honor unto death.
With
a few exceptions, the bushi were men of the sword as well as of learning. The
word bushi was eventually replaced by the word samurai, which implied a
professional combatant. The sword was the fighter’s basic weapon, the guardian
of his honor as a warrior.
The Tale of the Heike is an epic account
of the struggle between two clans for control of Japan
at the end of the 12th century. It described a typical samurai as
follows.
“Ashikaga
no Tadatsuna wore a lattice-patterned orange brocade battle robe and over it
armor laced with red leather. From the crown of the helmet curved two long ox
horns . . . . In the sash around his waist was a gold-studded sword, and in the
quiver on his back were arrows black and white spotted hawk feathers. He
gripped a bow bound thickly with lacquered rattan.”
Armor
notwithstanding, King notes that such dazzling equipment had its downside in
that it made the possessor a conspicuous target for his enemies. One also
wonders about all that gear. How did a fully outfitted samurai move about, much
less fight?
Another
aside. Amazon Books offers a volume with the snappy title of Samurai Secrets of the Slot Machine. I
glanced at a couple of pages, and that was enough to turn my interest and my
stomach. The book has absolutely nothing to do with either samurai or Zen. It’s
mostly about how to deal with the annoyances of squandering one’s money.
So
what was it about Zen that appealed to the Japanese warrior mind?
Zen was
uncomplicated. It did not require any acts of faith, as were common in Amida’s Pure
Land. It did not involve any ritualism,
as in Shinto. There was no dependence on words and letters, no
authoritative writings to interpret. Zen pointed directly to the essence of man
and the sense of awakened awareness.
I mentioned that
many samurai were educated. Many other swordsmen were untaught, which meant
their minds were not to be messed around with rules and regulations and
scriptural quotes. They dealt in right now, the moment between life and death.
Their actions were instinctive, intuitive.
In battle, pausing
to think about matters was the kiss of death.
To quote King:
“This character of Zen then put it well within the range of samurai awareness
and emotional compatibility . . . . . it was not mere theory. . . . . It tended
to free one to ‘gut feeling’ of what the immediate situation called for, . . .
.”
Calming the mind
through meditation was an integral part of samurai training, and some samurai
were presented with koans.
The British authority
on Japanese culture, Trevor Leggett, mentions one koan given to a samurai named
Ryozan. It asked what he would do if, when going into the bath naked, a hundred
enemies surrounded him.
“Let me win
without surrendering and without fighting,” was Ryozan’s response.
It seems that a
koan helped to break down any fixed ideas in the mind of the samurai, and
caused him to realize his own immediate capacities. In that, he was able to act
spontaneously.
A koan did not
necessarily create a better swordsman. However, it could lead him into the
behavior of instinctive action.
An anonymous Zen
poet wrote a few short lines about Zen combat.
Some think
striking is to strike,
But striking is
not to strike, nor is killing to kill.
He who strikes and
he who is struck—
They are both no
more than a dream which has no reality.
D.T. Suzuki
mentioned that swordsmanship is like a boat gliding down the rapids. A mind of
no-hesitation, no-interruption, no-mediacy is highly valued.
To close, here are
three lines from D.T. Suzuki that may help to resolve the dichotomy between Zen
and swordsmanship. Feel free to carry their image home.
Victory is for the
one,
Even before the
combat,
Who has no thought
of himself.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home